Zipcar: entering my world

On wet and windy Tuesday mornings, my focus is not always 100% as I wander from bus to tube. But this morning, I was roused from my torpor by the sight of people with ZIPCAR on their jackets in bright green writing. It's always nice when something you write about becomes a reality in your world....and this morning brought back memories of having covered Zipcar and Flexcar in articles on the Global Ideas Bank 7 or 8 years ago. In fact, it seems amazing that it has taken it this long to really hit the UK in any concerted way, but is now a genuinely viable option for Londoners to take advantage of (as well as those of you reading in Boston and Chicago).

Basically you pay an annual fee, and then get charged on an hourly or daily rate on top. Including insurance and everything though, it is cheaper than hiring a car a couple of times a year....though I wonder if there is a scrum around particular time of the year (Christmas). Particularly for the Minis or BMWs ;0)

Also interesting to see how they've split it definitively for personal and business use, the latter being a distinct option for (smaller) companies wishing to retain flexibility but also tick green boxes and not have to adminsiter a company car fleet. Will be interesting to see if it can take off here....

Beijing Social Innovation Conference

So good they blogged it twice. Here's my post from the SSE blog, which is of obvious resonance and relevance for GIBbers also:

A few blog posts about the Beijing conference on social innovation from others already, but here's my contribution/reaction...chronologically, for want of any better ordering method.

SUNDAY: Arrived after a good flight chatting to Brett Wigdortz (of Teach First fame) and Steve McAdam (from Fluid) amongst others, and having flitted between Mission Impossible Three and China Shakes the World. Given my short amount of time, Brett and I caught the tube into the centre of Beijing that night for a brief glance at Tiananmen Square, and a good roast duck....before the real work began....

MONDAY: I was slightly disconcerted on my way down to the opening ceremony by the fact that the CNN news report I'd been watching in the hotel room had been cut off in the middle (it was concerning Nepal/Tibet border shooting: see this article for both sides of the story), leaving a black screen.

Anyway, we kicked off with intros from the organisers and dignitaries. Couple of quotes I captured include Gerard Lemos (of British Council) saying that social entrepreneurs had "optimism as a social duty, even a moral duty", and that this was driven by "people who understand people", and that "policy should be driven by practice, not the other way round".

Geoff Mulgan (of Young Foundation) said that YF saw this as the "beginning of a global network of shared thinking", and hoped it would "speed up the process of innovation and learning". More interestingly, perhaps he also talked about "tapping into collective intelligence", and the need for "leadership providing the space for innovators to evolve". Finally, he also related it back to Michael Young who had "a clear focus on needs, an empathy to understand how people are experiencing those needs and a willingness to act" to address them.

Other highlights from the various presentations included:

- Ezio Manzini (from EMUDE, amongst others) discussing everyday social innovations at the grassroots, and of the importance of everyone getting the opportunity to be involved

- John Bird (of Big Issue) waking a few up by saying that "it was a crying shame that there aren't more people like me up here saying 'I was part of the problem and am now part of the solution' " amongst other slightly tired, if entertaining ramblings

- Yang Xuedong, from CCPE, discussed the Local Innovations Prize, and how it had helped evaluate government performance in Chinese regions, and help make them more accountable; it was also interesting to hear how it had stimulated the development of local democratic politics in some areas

- Shen Dongshu, from Fu Ping, champions NGOs in China, and has a social entrepreneur school (capacity building focus), an entrepreneurial fund and other initiatives;

- Steve McAdam (see above) talked about their bottom-up, people-centred approach to planning and regeneration, next to which my notes simply say "very interesting; follow up"

- later we got more international perspectives with Peter Spink from Brazil reeling off countless interesting examples (an open access online participative budget, for example) and talking about genuine grassroots-led change, based on pragmatism, diagonal and horizontal relationships and "incremental learning-by-doing"....+ Rhoda Kadelie from South Africa giving some inspiring innovations from there, including dance and opera initiatives amongs the black community, as well as some damning critiques of SA govt; Josephine Green added the corporate design perspective from Philips, adding (intriguingly from a multinational) that "the concept of enough is one we ought to explore"...

- After the break-out sessions (too much to report here) came a banquet, a mask-changing dance and a poem, no less, in our honour....

TUESDAY:

Slightly smaller crowd on Tuesday morning (Monday night drinks anyone?), and an equally packed line-up. Simon Tucker from YF's Launchpad kicked off, outlining some of their current projects, followed by Lv Zhao from the Shanghai NPO Network who gave an interesting overview of the Chinese NGO scene (I love the concept of a government-sponsored non-governmental organisation....but some would argue that many of our third sector organisations are in this situation as well...)

- Mike Gibbons gave a clear and focused presentation on his challenges and approaches at the DfES' Innovation Unit, particularly interesting around leadership learning, and enabling others to take risks

- John Thackara discussed his Designs of the Time project in the North-East of England, and made the important point that technological innovation should be driven by social innovation/social needs, not the other way round....an interesting project to track

- another breakout session (which helped give me more of an insight into the Chinese third sector scene, if I can even categorise it like that) took place before the round-ups; the one key thing I wrote down here was from He Fan (I think) who said:

"in China everyone is born an entrepreneur" and "small progress in China is multiplied by one billion", followed by the payoff, "real social entrepreneurs should come to prove themselves in China"; that's the sound of a gauntlet being thrown down, I believe....

I also found the Mondragon perspective very interesting (thanks Carlos), as scaling but keeping true to principles and values is a real problem in this sector. Mondragon have much to share on this, i think.

Final round-ups followed before dinner, and then a Wednesday morning meeting about the prospects for a social innovation network; watch this space, I guess..... but I'll post up this mindmap to give an indication of the tentative beginnings of a mapping exercise....(click to expand, I think).

Yf_china_soc_inn_network_of_networks




Overall - lots of material, lots of speakers, lots of thoughts, lots of good networking: a really good beginning to providing some momentum and focus in this area, widening out to encompass multitudes, as it were, rather than becoming stuck in the same areas and silos. As ever, hearing from other fields (design, architecture) and other locations (China, Brazil, South Africa) is inspiring and fires off other ideas...

International Conference on Social Innovation, Beijing

Delighted this morning to be invited to the International Conference on Social Innovation in Beijing (October 15th-17th). Not sure whether I will be able to go, but delighted to be invited all the same.

"The British Council China, the Young Foundation and the China Centre for Comparative Politics and Economics wish to invite you to the first ever International Social Innovation Conference scheduled for Beijing in October 2006.  China’s impressive record of economic growth has brought with it urgent social challenges requiring the urgent attention of government, business and the not-for-profit sector.

  Attention to social development has emerged as a central theme of China’s 11th five year plan and attention to social innovation cases and processes will capture the attention and imagination of key government, business and social leaders."

All exciting stuff; for more, go to Discover Social Innovation or the British Council's website

Hate Something, Change Something...

I seem to be plagued in my television-watching at the moment by Honda's Hate Something, Change Something advert for their new diesel engine. It's attracted a fair bit of attention, either for being all plants, rainbows and bunny rabbits (rather than...er...diesel engines), or for just being an annoyingly catchy song.

[Here are the lyrics:

Here’s a little song for anyone who’s ever hated…
in the key of Grr

Can hate be good?
Can hate be great?
Can hate be good?
Can hate be great?
Can hate be something we don’t hate?
Whistling…

We’d like to know
why it is so
that certain diesels must be slow
and thwack and thrum
and pong and hum
can clatter clat

Penguins on see-saw bring changeHate something
Change something
Hate something change something
Make something better
Whistling…

Oh isn’t it just bliss
when a diesel goes just like this?
Whistling…

Sing it like you hate it…
Hate something
Change something
Hate something
Change something
Make something better].

But, after cursing the rabbits with their ear-mufflers again, I got to thinking about whether this was actually a valid, if simple, way to change things: hate something, change something, make it better. Now one could say that that is simply a version of find a problem, solve it, improve things, but it is the idea of it springing from hate that I find interesting. As the song puts it, "Can hate be good? Can hate be great? Can hate be something we can't hate?"

Certainly there is something to be said for channelling negative energy into positive action (or, as Karl Kraus put it, "Hate must make a man productive.  Otherwise one might as well love." Slightly cynical then....), but is hate too strong. Or is it perhaps that strength of feeling about a problem that makes people get up and find the solution (or make the change)? I'm not suggesting that that was Honda's impetus: they are looking for a larger share of the diesel market and trying to appeal to the green/friendly bunny car buyers.

Or perhaps it is strength of feeling allied to capacity to change that makes it happen...after all, the dirtiness of diesel engines might enrage me, but I probably couldn't have built a more eco-friendly one. Similarly, it would be difficult for me to upgrade the District Line single-handed (though perhaps quicker).

In Nicholas Albery's 50 tips for social inventors, he specified that his model was, when confronted with a problem, to ask "How can I solve this problem in such a way that it could then help others to solve it too?" Which is a kind of "Hate Something, Change Something, Make it Better (for me and for other people)" approach.


Salad dressing fuel

On a more cheery and less cynical note, could sunflower oil hold the key to a sustainable, renewable fuel future? Well, possibly, according to this Guardian story which I missed a little while back. I'm always slightly hesitant to post up stuff about fuels of the future, because I seem to have written about so many different types, none of which has ever come to fruition (see the Science and Energy section of the Global Ideas Bank for more). Still, this seems to have potential: "a hydrogen generator that uses only sunflower oil, air and water vapour", with the 'secret' being down to "two catalysts, one based on nickel, the other on carbon". Worth having a dry salad for, indeed.

Lessons from a vacation

I've just had a brief and enjoyable sojourn to Montreal, and thought I'd just write a bit about a few interesting things I noted about Canada (and Quebec) while I was there.

First off, the whole place seems much more laid-back: you can't help but ponder the differences in work-life balance between here and the UK, when everyone is focused on their leisure activities, be they canoe camping, sailing, hiking or, in the winter, skiing.

Secondly, the trains were a revelation: quite pricey (i.e. just cheaper than the UK) but with more legroom than the Eurostar, and a check-in person for each carriage. Just nice people, too...

Thirdly, while there is a fair preponderance of large and unnecessary cars (although many do at least use these vast vehicles here for what they were intended), there are also large swathes of safe cycling paths and areas, and people actually use them.

Fourthly, recycling is much more obvious and much more widespread.

Finally, the fact that French is the first language seems to have a kind of civilising effect. It really is like crossing the US with Europe into a slightly strange but welcoming mélange.

Safety Text

There's been much in the news yesterday in the UK about the launch of the new Safety Text service, started by John Blackman, father of Lucie Blackman, the hostess killed in Japan. The general principle is, as stated in the BBC's article:

"Users create a message detailing their travel plans and set a time delay of between 30 minutes and 24 hours. If they have not returned and cancelled the message by the deadline, it is sent to a chosen friend or relative.....The Safetytext service stores photographs, contact details and the names of friends and relatives, releasing them to police in the event of the customer disappearing. Users can register for the paid-for service at Safetytext.com. Each message costs 50p on a pay-as-you-go basis, or 33p if paid for by monthly £5 top-up."

This is, of course, a good idea. What I find a shame is that essentially the same idea was launched in November 2003: Amber Response. Because of the circumstances and publicity surrounding his daughter's death, though, Safety Text has inevitably got a huge amount of press coverage, much of it proclaiming the great innovation. It is a great idea, and it is wonderful that John Blackman has acted to turn a personal tragedy into a positive solution, but let's not ignore who got there first, or necessarily choose a service for its press rather than its performance.

Security line charity contributions

One of the best ideas into the Global Ideas Bank for a long time today, one of those ideas that makes you wish you'd thought of it:

Security line charity contributions

This suggestion, from Gary Emenitove in the US, hopes to turn a negative and irritating process (standing in a security line, being searched etc) into something positive. He points out that:

"In airports, we are asked to empty our pockets of all metal objects before going through airport security. This often results in a handful of pocket change.... At each security line there could be a collection device where people could put their spare change while emptying pockets. The collection would be regularly emptied and given to local charities."

Like all the best social inventions, this is inventive but extremely simple, and could be put into place with little cost: which airport will put it into place first?

Tube-less and homebound

Am confined to home today by another marvellous London tube strike...but will resist the wish to vent fury at the parties involved, and instead follow the mantra of the Global Ideas Bank: don't dwell on the problems, focus on the solutions.

So here's a load of Transport Ideas to get your teeth into.

Taxing the big cars, a la France

As reported in yesterday's Guardian, France launches radical green tax on bigger cars....which will work like this:

"Under the scheme, all new cars sold in France will be divided into five classes, from the least polluting to the most.

Most mid-sized family cars, such as the Renault Scenic, will fall into middle "neutral" band, category C, and be liable for neither a surcharge or a rebate, the spokesman said.

But smaller runabouts that emit less than 140g per kilometre of carbon monoxide, the main greenhouse effect gas, will benefit from a rebate ranging from €200 to €700, as will diesel cars fitted with filters to remove harmful fine particles from their exhaust.

And at the other end of the scale, drivers who opt for a large luxury saloon with a powerful engine emitting more than 180g of CO2, or for an outsized, diesel-driven four-by-four not fitted with a particle filter, will face a surcharge ranging from €1,500 to €3,500."

The French estimate that, of the two million cars sold every year, about half will fall into the central 'neutral' category, with the little eco-friendly car drivers rebate being directly subsidised by the tax on the big unfriendly car drivers. The system, which will come into force on January 1st 2005, is particularly aimed at the drivers of SUVs, which one French official called "a caricature of a car". Its ultimate objective is, of course, to reduce atmospheric pollution, which is blamed for 30,000 deaths each year in France.

As my French teacher might have said, "A mon avis, c'est une trés bonne idée".