TED / Doors of Perception

Couple of big, hairy interesting events on at present, namely:

- TED 2007; you can read all about it via the TED blog of course. They are bringing together "FIFTY REMARKABLE PEOPLE" (in capitals, so they must be remarkable) who are icons, geniuses and mavericks. They include Edward De Bono, Jeff Skoll, Jaime Lerner, Lawrence Lessig, RIchard Branson and...er.... Tracy Chapman.

Day one wrap; day two wrap....which do sound pretty thought-provoking...

- and the lesser-known Doors of Perception in Delhi; this genuinely looks AMAZING (justified capitals!); there is enough in the participants and their projects to blog about for the rest of the year...so check them out; we will be revisiting several of these projects soon, and have no doubt there will be some interesting conversations coming out of the event (on Worldchanging and elsewhere)

21st Century News Challenge

Been meaning to mention this for a little while, the Knight Brothers 21st Century Challenge:

"Turn the web on its head. Show us how online news can help people improve their lives and shape their communities.

Knight Foundation is seeking new ideas, pilot projects, commercial products and leadership initiatives that will improve the flow of information and news in the public interest.

In 2007, we will award a total of $5 million to individuals, organizations or businesses that can show their ideas will transform community life."

Apply before December 31st with your great ideas...it looks very interesting for creative social inventor types out there (maybe the GIB should be applying?), particularly:


"Those who receive awards in this category must agree to share their ideas with others, further developing them publicly in a blog on a Knight-designated web site for at least a year.

The public would be encouraged to comment on the idea. The author would reply and nurture the discussion."

 

Beijing Social Innovation Conference

So good they blogged it twice. Here's my post from the SSE blog, which is of obvious resonance and relevance for GIBbers also:

A few blog posts about the Beijing conference on social innovation from others already, but here's my contribution/reaction...chronologically, for want of any better ordering method.

SUNDAY: Arrived after a good flight chatting to Brett Wigdortz (of Teach First fame) and Steve McAdam (from Fluid) amongst others, and having flitted between Mission Impossible Three and China Shakes the World. Given my short amount of time, Brett and I caught the tube into the centre of Beijing that night for a brief glance at Tiananmen Square, and a good roast duck....before the real work began....

MONDAY: I was slightly disconcerted on my way down to the opening ceremony by the fact that the CNN news report I'd been watching in the hotel room had been cut off in the middle (it was concerning Nepal/Tibet border shooting: see this article for both sides of the story), leaving a black screen.

Anyway, we kicked off with intros from the organisers and dignitaries. Couple of quotes I captured include Gerard Lemos (of British Council) saying that social entrepreneurs had "optimism as a social duty, even a moral duty", and that this was driven by "people who understand people", and that "policy should be driven by practice, not the other way round".

Geoff Mulgan (of Young Foundation) said that YF saw this as the "beginning of a global network of shared thinking", and hoped it would "speed up the process of innovation and learning". More interestingly, perhaps he also talked about "tapping into collective intelligence", and the need for "leadership providing the space for innovators to evolve". Finally, he also related it back to Michael Young who had "a clear focus on needs, an empathy to understand how people are experiencing those needs and a willingness to act" to address them.

Other highlights from the various presentations included:

- Ezio Manzini (from EMUDE, amongst others) discussing everyday social innovations at the grassroots, and of the importance of everyone getting the opportunity to be involved

- John Bird (of Big Issue) waking a few up by saying that "it was a crying shame that there aren't more people like me up here saying 'I was part of the problem and am now part of the solution' " amongst other slightly tired, if entertaining ramblings

- Yang Xuedong, from CCPE, discussed the Local Innovations Prize, and how it had helped evaluate government performance in Chinese regions, and help make them more accountable; it was also interesting to hear how it had stimulated the development of local democratic politics in some areas

- Shen Dongshu, from Fu Ping, champions NGOs in China, and has a social entrepreneur school (capacity building focus), an entrepreneurial fund and other initiatives;

- Steve McAdam (see above) talked about their bottom-up, people-centred approach to planning and regeneration, next to which my notes simply say "very interesting; follow up"

- later we got more international perspectives with Peter Spink from Brazil reeling off countless interesting examples (an open access online participative budget, for example) and talking about genuine grassroots-led change, based on pragmatism, diagonal and horizontal relationships and "incremental learning-by-doing"....+ Rhoda Kadelie from South Africa giving some inspiring innovations from there, including dance and opera initiatives amongs the black community, as well as some damning critiques of SA govt; Josephine Green added the corporate design perspective from Philips, adding (intriguingly from a multinational) that "the concept of enough is one we ought to explore"...

- After the break-out sessions (too much to report here) came a banquet, a mask-changing dance and a poem, no less, in our honour....

TUESDAY:

Slightly smaller crowd on Tuesday morning (Monday night drinks anyone?), and an equally packed line-up. Simon Tucker from YF's Launchpad kicked off, outlining some of their current projects, followed by Lv Zhao from the Shanghai NPO Network who gave an interesting overview of the Chinese NGO scene (I love the concept of a government-sponsored non-governmental organisation....but some would argue that many of our third sector organisations are in this situation as well...)

- Mike Gibbons gave a clear and focused presentation on his challenges and approaches at the DfES' Innovation Unit, particularly interesting around leadership learning, and enabling others to take risks

- John Thackara discussed his Designs of the Time project in the North-East of England, and made the important point that technological innovation should be driven by social innovation/social needs, not the other way round....an interesting project to track

- another breakout session (which helped give me more of an insight into the Chinese third sector scene, if I can even categorise it like that) took place before the round-ups; the one key thing I wrote down here was from He Fan (I think) who said:

"in China everyone is born an entrepreneur" and "small progress in China is multiplied by one billion", followed by the payoff, "real social entrepreneurs should come to prove themselves in China"; that's the sound of a gauntlet being thrown down, I believe....

I also found the Mondragon perspective very interesting (thanks Carlos), as scaling but keeping true to principles and values is a real problem in this sector. Mondragon have much to share on this, i think.

Final round-ups followed before dinner, and then a Wednesday morning meeting about the prospects for a social innovation network; watch this space, I guess..... but I'll post up this mindmap to give an indication of the tentative beginnings of a mapping exercise....(click to expand, I think).

Yf_china_soc_inn_network_of_networks




Overall - lots of material, lots of speakers, lots of thoughts, lots of good networking: a really good beginning to providing some momentum and focus in this area, widening out to encompass multitudes, as it were, rather than becoming stuck in the same areas and silos. As ever, hearing from other fields (design, architecture) and other locations (China, Brazil, South Africa) is inspiring and fires off other ideas...

Camp Invention and World-Changing Trends

Couple of things caught the Global Ideas Bank eye recently:

- Camp Invention which is not about new products for the gay market, but about helping introduce (US) kids to innovation and problem-solving, in an effort to create the next generation of entrepreneurs and inventors of all kinds. See the Invent Now site for more. Employers are increasingly demanding those types of skills and traits (problem-solving, innovation, creativity, flexilibility etc) which are associated with being an inventor or entrepreneurs, so this is an area which will only increase as the years pass...

- Wired magazine has had a number of interesting pieces (looking forward to Chris Anderson's The Long Tail book with breath that is nothing short of bated), including the top 15 ways to live longer...but most interesting was this piece on six world-changing trends, which is of interest to all futurists. Even if it seems obvious whilst reading it, the grouping of these together helps solidify and clarify some disparate thoughts about the way business and the economy (and therefore our lives...) are changing. The six, for reference, are:

People Power
Video Unlimited
Personalise It
Carbon Killers
Buy It Now
All-Access Economy

- And to pick up the first of those, People Power, my old friend Ming the Mechanic has blogged about crowdsourcing which kind of combines a lot of other stuff being bandied around (Pro-Ams work by Demos, wisdom of crowds/open source stuff, virtual volunteering etc.). Worth a read, even if the term is yet to make the OED.

- Also pleased to see that a GIB idea by John Tunney from way back when (see Lottery entry slips: 10% tick box for charity) has kind of made it into reality in the form of Your Pound, Your Choice. Different type of people power...

If only some of the other lottery ideas we've had over the years could make it too. Look forward to the day when the House of Lords is picked by lottery (topical...) and to the Fame Lottery, Pension Lottery and, by no means least, the Rubbish Lottery. Which are all far from being as silly as they may sound....

International Conference on Social Innovation, Beijing

Delighted this morning to be invited to the International Conference on Social Innovation in Beijing (October 15th-17th). Not sure whether I will be able to go, but delighted to be invited all the same.

"The British Council China, the Young Foundation and the China Centre for Comparative Politics and Economics wish to invite you to the first ever International Social Innovation Conference scheduled for Beijing in October 2006.  China’s impressive record of economic growth has brought with it urgent social challenges requiring the urgent attention of government, business and the not-for-profit sector.

  Attention to social development has emerged as a central theme of China’s 11th five year plan and attention to social innovation cases and processes will capture the attention and imagination of key government, business and social leaders."

All exciting stuff; for more, go to Discover Social Innovation or the British Council's website

Using obituaries to make a life change

I was listening to the radio the other morning (BBC Radio 4 presumably: my girlfriend and I have an ongoing battle, switching between 4 and 5 when the other is out of the room...she normally wins), and there was a woman speaking about how she'd decided to give up investment banking and become "an adventurer" (I think that's what she said...but was half asleep). So she'd given up her previous career and made a life change and gone off and done exciting things in exciting places and changed people's lives....So far, so good (although I do always think it's easier to make that kind of change when you have a nice pile of cash from your previous career to use!)...

Anyway, what was interesting, as an idea, for me, was that she decided to make this change finally as a result of writing two obituaries for herself. In the first, it was all well-liked, married, two kids, successful banker blah; and in the second it was all awe-inspiring, amazing, extraordinary courage blah. Which would you choose.

I thought this was quite a neat way of weighing up career (or other) options, by trying to view things in the long-term and with an objective tone and viewpoint. Also interesting to compare this approach to Blair and Bush's current obsession with legacy and "how they will be remembered" (see this amusing rant by Tim Dowling, which suggests naming Stansted airport after Blair now to get this legacy nonsense out the way)....

And on THAT note, a brief announcement that the Natural Death Centre's Day of the Dead is held on Saturday April 29th this year....see their website for more details.

Social Silicon Valleys: the worlds of social innovation

A brief post to note that the Young Foundation have put up a draft of their social innovation overview / manifesto, Social Silicon Valleys. [please note: it's'a big pdf.....]. It's a very interesting, coherent approach to starting to methodically think about how, why, and where social innovation occurs (and in what ways...). It rightly identifies a lack of research in this specific field (though futurist studies, 'general' innovation research and social entrepreneurship studies inevitably crossover into / form part of that world) as something that needs to be addressed....which the YF will, of course, aim to do.

It also looks at and details various models and approaches: the heroic individual (aka social entrepreneur / social inventor), the political effect (laws etc.), non-profit organisations, and broader movements (feminism, civil rights). Looking with a view to create the types of environment and structure and approach that can allow/enable social innovation to flourish.

Anyway, I'm not going to go through all 60+ pages now: take a look yourself, and suggest any additions/amendments to the paper's authors. Relevant to anyone interested in how social change happens, and how innovation occurs.

Other than that, GIB is massively busy with social inventions itself, and I've been busy reading Malcolm Gladwell's new blog.....don't blink or you'll miss it.

Energy perspectives

Amazing sometimes how articles appearing on the same day in the media can set off thoughts and ideas in your own head. In the same way that the best innovations are often new combinations of existing ideas, so reading one article and then another can cause a greater effect than either on their own.

That's how I felt on my journey in this morning reading first that Sweden plans to be world's first oil-free economy. How marvellous, I thought, what a great forward-thinking attitude....only to turn the page to read that BP profits of £11bn disappoint the City. That's right, £11bn profits were disappointing; does anyone at the stock exchange read that and appreciate how absurd it is?

What stuck out to me in the article about Sweden was that their Minister for Sustainable Development (an innovation in itself) said that "A Sweden free of fossil fuels would give us enormous advantages"...by which she meant business advantages, because the country would be free from fluctuating oil prices and any future energy crises.

Obviously, the Global Ideas Bank has been a keen campaigner for progress being measured in terms of wellbeing, life satisfaction and happiness (see here)...but the fact is that there is a hugely powerful purely economic case for taking the lead from the Swedes. Even George Bush seems to be waking up to the fact that relying on oil from a region that is, in large areas, an antagonistically anti-American zone, is perhaps not a great long-term policy. So why are the governments dragging their heels? The UK is already behind schedule to reach 10% of renewable energy by 2012...and yet they continue not to address these issues. Businesses themselves are starting to lead government on such matters, in the knowledge that they will not be able to dodge the climate change bullet.

And these issues seem to connect like a Buzan mind-map for me across areas of social innovation: our short-termist political system leads to short-term thinking (and an underestimation, as Geoff Mulgan put it in a policy seminar, of what they can achieve in the long-term), so social innovations are needed to reform politics accordingly; the power of big business and corporations needs to be addressed; environmental innovations need to be given the chance to flourish and replicate; and the money:progress ratio needs to be broken, with a greater focus on life satisfaction and wellbeing....and so on and so forth.

The problems are out there; but so are the solutions. I'm optimistic, given the human capacity to imagine how things might otherwise be, that is to innovate and adapt, that we can overcome the obstacles that face us. But I might have to stop reading the paper to stay that way....

 

Backing the World Up

As the person responsible for changing the tape in our IT servers, this article in New Scientist about, well, backing up the world (or Doomsday vault to avoid world famine, as they put it) appealed to me. Two million seeds will be held in a concrete room in a mountain on a freezing island by the Norwegian government and the Global Crop Diversity Trust. The theory being that this would "safeguard the world's food supply against nuclear war, climate change, terrorism, rising sea levels, earthquakes and the ensuing collapse of electricity supplies", assuming anyone is alive to do it, of course (or can remember how).

Reminds me of some past ideas on the GIB, including:

- the similarly cheery Post-Apocalptic Human Knowledge Manual
- a Full Catalogue of the Edible World

and another one I can't dig out about storing this kind of knowledge / civilisation back-up off the Earth in some sort of space capsule......

[All this originally prompted via WorldChanging  and the Guardian]


Futures thinking...

Chris Yapp, the Head of Public Sector Innovation at Microsoft UK (Google results), was an expert witness at the School for Social Entrepreneurs' Essentials Programme yesterday, here in East London. He's an incredibly stimulating speaker, bringing an avalanche of new ideas and techniques into your world to apply to what you do.

One thing (amongst many) that he mentioned in passing was new uses of technology in education (which Microsoft are supporting; see here for their various community investment activities). The example he gave was of a class who had been recording their lessons, then podcasting them so that fellow pupils who'd missed them could listen to them on their MP3 player; best (or most contentiously!) of all, the teachers had no idea it was going on. Genius.

What it shows is the myriad uses of new technology once it reaches a certain point of take-up. With broadband and MP3 player take-up increasing daily, options for such uses becomes a real possibility. Factoring in other developments (like Skype's addition of video calling), and the potential seems limitless. Imagine a world where a grandmother living on her own can switch her computer on, download the latest chapter of an audiobook straight to her MP3 player, then have a (currently free) video call with her grandchildren to tell them what she thought. Indeed, there's probably a forward-thinking silver surfer (ghastly phrase) whose doing that as I write.

What the futurologists inspire us to do is to think of the new uses, to be strategic in real forward planning, and to factor in the effect of new innovations. It's a challenge, but an exciting one.